Acoustic Phonetic
Study on Lao Tones
MASUKO Yukie, SUZUKI
Reiko
This study attempts to examine the acoustic phonetic
characteristics of Lao tones not to show that five tones contrast to one another
on equal terms, but to show hierarchical contrast.
In order to scrutinize acoustic characteristics
reflecting tonal contrast in various phonemic environments, we selected a set of
monosyllabic and disyllabic words. As to monosyllabic words, minimal pairs are
selected differing only in tones. By combining two monosyllabic words, we made
morpho-syntactic phrases showing all the possible twenty-five combination of
tones. We also selected twenty-five disyllabic words that show tonal contrast
between the first and the second syllable.
Comparison of pitch patterns of the first and the second
monosyllabic word or those of the first and the second syllable of disyllabic
words shows no “typical” tonal patterns. Instead, we found two major types in
pitch curves, fall-rise type and (rise-) fall type. The former comprises the
forth and the fifth, and the latter, the first, the second and the third tones.
Within each type, contrast between ‘marked’ and ‘unmarked’ can be effectively
observed. In the fall-rise type, the fifth tone is ‘marked’ showing the lowest
F0 of the speaker during its pitch curve while the forth tone is ‘unmarked’. In
the (rise-)fall type, the second and the third tones are ‘marked’ showing the
steep fall in the latter half of the pitch curve while the first tone are
‘unmarked’.
Whereas the marked tones show their characteristics
positively, the unmarked tones, when located next to the marked one, try to
avoid showing characteristics similar to the marked one, by bearing their
variant form to add some prominence to its adjacent marked one. We claim the
variant forms cannot be explained in terms of coarticulatory perturbation since
they are realized such as contour with 20 Hz higher depending on their tonal
environments.
We observed that the fifth tone is the marked one
compared with the fourth tone within the fall-rise type. Among (rise-)fall type
tones, however, it is still not clear whether the ‘unmarked’ first tone
contrasts with the ‘marked’ second and third tones, since between the second and
the third tones, ‘markedness’ of each is unique to the tone and the one appears
indifferent to the characteristic of the other’s, to which further consideration
is necessary.